Overview

This project will allow you to explore the wealth of excellent online resources
available to art history students. Since your textbook includes only an
overview of major works of art and art historical issues, this assignment will
allow you to focus on a work or issue in greater detail as it is presented
online on a museum or other educational website. By studying a site and
presenting a report on that site to your classmates, you will begin to develop
a collection of free trustworthy resources at your fingertips, as well as a
discriminating eye for scholarly art historical analysis.

Learning Outcomes

By the end of this assignment, you will
have:

  • Become
    familiar with a diverse selection of credible online resources in art
    history
  • Learned
    how to glean useful knowledge from these websites that will aid in your
    understanding of art history
  • Developed
    an in-depth report on one of these website

Task Description

Review
the websites below and select ONE on
which you will focus
. You can select any one of the sites
depending on your interest in a particular region or era. For that site,
familiarize yourself with most of the links therein and concepts and artworks
covered. Develop a report on this site for the benefit of your classmates in
which you summarize the main ideas presented, provide an in-depth description
of a couple of those ideas, apply them to the material presented in the
appropriate chapter in your textbook (i.e. ancient Greece and Rome, Renaissance
Art, Baroque Art, etc), and bring in relevant research to support your
observations. Also, bring in a couple of these images as illustrations of these
concepts, including one or more of the works considered in the website.
Consider the following questions as you proceed: on what does the site focus?
Is it informational, argumentative, etc?; What can we learn about the art and
its culture that the textbook does not provide?; What questions do you still
have? What have you discovered through further research that adds to our
understanding of artist, issue, etc? You may come up with other questions and
answers, but these are a good place to start.

1) The Cave of Chauvet-Pont-d’Arc

http://www.culture.gouv.fr/culture/arcnat/chauvet/en/index.html

2) The British Museum: Assyria, Babylonia, Sumer

http://www.mesopotamia.co.uk/menu.html

3) History: The Egyptians

http://www.bbc.co.uk/history/ancient/egyptians/

4) The Parthenon Marbles: The British Museum vs. The Hellenic
Ministry of Culture

http://www.britishmuseum.org/the_museum/news_and_debate/debate/parthenon_sculptures.aspx

and http://odysseus.culture.gr/a/1/12/ea120.html

5) The False Door: Dissolution and Becoming in Roman
Wall-Painting

http://creadm.solent.ac.uk/custom/rwpainting/cover/index.html

6) Beyond the Fingers: The Sistine Chapel Revealed

http://www.ronibennun.com/beyond/beyond.html

7) Universal Leonardo (on the Renaissance artist,
Leonardo da Vinci)

http://www.universalleonardo.org/

8) Johannes Vermeer’s Woman Holding a Balance
(National Gallery of Art)

http://www.nga.gov/feature/vermeer/index.shtm

You might also watch the short video on this painting produced by the National
Gallery. You can find it herehttp://www.nga.gov/podcasts/ Click
on “The Collection” on the left side of the page and scroll down
until you reach “Vermeer: Master of Light-Woman Holding a Balance, Part
I.”

Process
& Requirements:

1)
Thoroughly review your chosen website. Create an outline or diagram on paper as
you do this so that you can better understand how the site is designed and what
topics are covered. In your own words, summarize the main ideas. Note the
direction or purpose of the site. Right click and save a couple of the images
that you believe are good illustrations of these ideas. Or, search for these
images online and import them into your report. Note any artists or works that
are covered both on the website and in your textbook and compare the
information given on them. If available, please make sure that you credit the
artist and work by giving the name, title, date, and medium!

2)
Conduct a little bit of research online on this topic. Try to determine the
website’s accuracy, learn more about the topic, and/or compare it with other
works by the same artist or from the same period by seeking out a good, online
resource on the subject. These sites are good places to start:http://arthistoryresources.net/ARTHLinks.html;http://www.besthistorysites.net/index.php/art-history; andhttp://smarthistory.khanacademy.org/ .
Find 1 good source and integrate any information found here into your
presentation, if relevant to your topic. Make sure you cite your source by
author and/or site name within your presentation. Please note that sites like
Wikipedia or an unverifiable source (personal blog, etc.) are NOT acceptable
sources for this presentation.

3)
Gather all information and create a 6+ page report using one of the following:

a) Powerpoint

b) MS
Word

c)
Prezi (http://prezi.com/)

d) Any
other suitable presentation software

4)
Include the title and link to your site within your report

5)
Post your final report under the drop box AND in the “Final Project
Discussion” forum as an attachment by the due date. There, your classmates
will be able to view and comment on your work.

6)
You MAY NOT copy
and paste the text from the website. Your writing must be your own. If you
plagiarize, you will not receive credit for the assignment. Ask me if you need
help with this concept. Here’s a good link on the subject of plagiarismhttp://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/589/02/

Evaluation

This project will be worth 20 points.

You will be evaluated according to the following:

Content 5
points

5-4: Provides a thorough description of the site, including
in-depth analyses of a couple of the topics covered; applies these concepts
to textbook readings; integrates research found through at least 1 credible,
academic source; images included and used to illustrate ideas

3-2: Provides an adequate description of site, but more
overview than analysis; barely applies concepts to textbook readings;
integrates some outside research, but not much; images included but not
described

1↓:
Poor description of website; no attempt to relate site to textbook readings;
no evidence of research conducted; no images included

Design of Presentation/Report
5
points

5-4: Design of report is thoughtful and creative, easy
to read and understand; topics arranged by subject heading; images posted
alongside text and credited; website name AND link included

3-2: Design of report is of average quality, somewhat
easy to read and understand; topics not arranged by subject heading; images
out of order; either website name OR link are included

1 ↓:
Design of report is of poor quality and difficult to follow; no images
included; neither website name NOR link are included

Mechanics
5
points

5-4: Contains minor, if any, errors in spelling and
grammar

3-2: Contains a handful of errors in spelling and
grammar

1 ↓: Contains many errors in spelling and grammar

Timeliness
5
points

5: Posted on due date

4-3: Posted 1-2 days late

2 ↓:
Posted more than 2 days late