Effects of Society on Child’s Education

Strayer
University

SOC
100: Introduction to Sociology

Assignment#
1: Writing Assignment – Part1

October
26, 2014

Pr. Lisa
Riggleman-Gross

Hypothesis

If a child is not suffering from social issues, then
he/she will succeed highly in achieving better education because social issues
such as: emotional, ethnic, gender, economic, cultural, and ethical issues
affect his/her performance.

Feed
back from professor
:

Good topic but broad. How will you define
“succeed” and you list many social issues. How will you measure
better education?

Writing
Assignment Overview

In this
Assignment, you will consider a social issue that interests you. It could be
human freedom, sexuality, deviance, crime, social mobility, poverty, education,
aging, or another similar issue. Within that general issue, you will select a
specific hypothesis to evaluate. You will conduct library research to gather
and critically evaluate evidence that bears on your hypothesis

This
assignment is completed in four (4) stages that build on each other. At
each stage, you should keep the final stage in mind.

Stage (and Week due)

Point Value

Description of Stage

Grading criteria

1
(Week 3)

50

Identifying
the Hypothesis

Hypothesis
is stated in a clear manner.

2
(Week 5)

100

Outline
and Preliminary List of References

Content
is provided for each component of the paper. A list of at least three
(3) references is provided.

3
(Week 8)

120

Draft
1

Evaluated
on content for each component, as well as writing skills, and use of
citations and references.

4
(Week 10)

150

Final
Version

Evaluated
on content for each component, as well as writing skills, and use of citations
and references.

In the
final stage of this assignment, you will submit a three to five (3-5) page
paper in which you:

1.
Specific Hypothesis. Introduce your paper by identifying the
specific hypothesis you are evaluating in this paper.

2.
Applicable Sociological Concepts. Identify the sociological
theories and terminology from the text that apply to your social issue

3.
Practical Implications. Discuss the value of sociological research
into your issue. Determine whether or not there are (or would be) practical
implications of sociological inquiry into this issue.

4.
Evidence. This is the most important part of the paper.
Analyze at least two (2) lines of evidence that pertain to the
hypothesis you are evaluating. Does the evidence support your hypothesis?
For each type of evidence, consider possible biases and alternative
interpretations.

5.
Conclusions. Draw conclusions based on the evidence that you have
discovered. Does the evidence confirm or refute your hypothesis? Is the
evidence sufficiently convincing to draw firm conclusions about your
hypothesis?

Rubric

6. Grading for this assignment will be based on
having outline content provided for each segment of the paper and at least
three (3) quality references, using the following rubric.

Points: 100

Writing Assignment (Part 2):
Investigate a Social Issue Outline

Criteria

Unacceptable

Below 60% F

Meets Minimum Expectations

60-69% D

Fair

70-79% C

Proficient

80-89% B

Exemplary

90-100% A

1. Specific
Hypothesis
. Introduce your paper by identifying the specific hypothesis
you are evaluating in this paper.

Weight:
15%

Hypothesis
statement is missing, insufficient, inaccurate or incomplete.

Hypothesis is not suitable for this exercise or is not
stated in a clear manner.

A hypothesis suitable for this exercise is stated in a
manner that is not entirely clear.

A hypothesis suitable for this exercise is stated in a
satisfactory manner.

A
hypothesis suitable for this exercise is stated in a clear and logical
manner.

2. Applicable
Sociological Concepts
. Identify the sociological theories and terminology
from the text that apply to your social issue.

Weight:
15%

Missing, insufficient, inaccurate or incomplete job of
correctly identifying sociological concepts and terminology.

Outline insufficiently identifies sociological concepts
and terminology.

Outline partially identifies sociological concepts and
terminology.

Outline satisfactorily identifies sociological concepts
and terminology.

Outline completely and correctly identifies sociological
concepts and terminology.

3. Practical
Implications
. Discuss the value of sociological research into your
issue. Determine whether or not there are (or would be) practical
implications of sociological inquiry into this issue.

Weight:
15%

Missing, insufficient, or incomplete statement of the
value of sociological research on the issue. Missing, insufficient, or
incomplete determination whether or not there are (or would be) practical
implications of sociological inquiry into this issue.

Outline insufficiently identifies the value of
sociological research on the issue. Outline insufficiently determines whether
or not there are (or would be) practical implications of sociological inquiry
into this issue.

Outline partially identifies the value of sociological
research on the issue. Outline partially determines whether or not there are
(or would be) practical implications of sociological inquiry into this issue.

Outline satisfactorily identifies the value of
sociological research on the issue. Outline satisfactorily determines whether
or not there are (or would be) practical implications of sociological inquiry
into this issue.

Outline completely and correctly identifies value of
sociological research on the issue. Outline completely and correctly determines
whether or not there are (or would be) practical implications of sociological
inquiry into this issue.

4. Evidence
(1 of 2).
Analyze a line of evidence that pertains to the hypothesis
you are evaluating. Does it support your hypothesis? Are their possible
biases and / or alternative interpretations?

Weight:
15%

Missing,
insufficient, or incomplete response.

Outline
insufficiently identifies a line of evidence and relevant biases or
alternative explanations.

Outline
partially identifies a line of evidence and relevant biases or alternative
explanations.

Outline
satisfactorily identifies a line of evidence and relevant biases or
alternative explanations.

Outline
thoroughly identifies a line of evidence and relevant biases or alternative
explanations.

5. Evidence
(2 of 2).
Analyze at least one (1) additional line of evidence
pertaining to the hypothesis you are evaluating. Does it support your
hypothesis? Are their possible biases and/or alternative
interpretations?

Weight:
15%

Missing,
insufficient, or incomplete response.

Outline
insufficiently identifies at least one (1) additional line of evidence
and relevant biases or alternative explanations.

Outline
partially identifies at least one (1) additional line of evidence and
relevant biases or alternative explanations.

Outline
satisfactorily identifies at least one (1) additional line of evidence
and relevant biases or alternative explanations.

Outline
thoroughly identifies at least one (1) additional line of evidence and
relevant biases or alternative explanations.

6. Conclusions.
Draw conclusions based on the evidence that you have discovered. Does
the evidence confirm or refute your hypothesis? Is the evidence
sufficiently convincing to draw firm conclusions about your hypothesis?

Weight:
15%

Missing, insufficient, or incomplete conclusions.

Outline insufficiently draws conclusions, or draws
conclusions that are not logical.

Outline shows conclusions that partially follow from the
evidence provided.

Outline shows conclusions that mostly follow from
the evidence provided.

Outline shows conclusions that logically follow from the
evidence provided.

7.
Quality of references.

Weight:
10%

Quantity and / or quality of references are unacceptable.

One (1) or fewer references and / or references are of
poor quality.

Two (2) or fewer references and / or the quality of
references is questionable.

Minimum of three (3) references and the quality of
references is mostly good.

Minimum of three (3) references and the quality of
references is good.