The final paper practical implications of sociological inquiry into this issue.

<!–[if
!supportLists]–>1. <!–[endif]–>Specific Hypothesis.

<!–[if
!supportLists]–>2. <!–[endif]–>Applicable
Sociological Concepts.

<!–[if
!supportLists]–>3. <!–[endif]–>Practical
Implications.
Discuss the value of sociological research into your issue. Determine
whether or not there are (or would be) practical implications of sociological
inquiry into this issue.

4.
Evidence. This is the most important part of the paper. Analyze
at least two (2) lines of evidence that pertain to the hypothesis that you
are evaluating. Does the evidence support your hypothesis? For each
type of evidence, consider possible biases and alternative
interpretations.

5.
Conclusions. Draw conclusions based on the evidence that you have
discovered. Does the evidence confirm or refute your hypothesis? Is the
evidence sufficiently convincing to draw firm conclusions about your
hypothesis?

<!–[if
!supportLists]–>I. <!–[endif]–>Specific Hypothesis.

<!–[if
!supportLists]–>II. <!–[endif]–>Applicable
Sociological Concepts.

<!–[if
!supportLists]–>a. <!–[endif]–>Theory A

<!–[if
!supportLists]–>b. <!–[endif]–>Concept 1

<!–[if
!supportLists]–>c. <!–[endif]–>Concept 2

<!–[if
!supportLists]–>III. <!–[endif]–>Practical
Implications.

<!–[if
!supportLists]–>a. <!–[endif]–>Implications for
public policy

<!–[if
!supportLists]–> i. <!–[endif]–>Education

<!–[if
!supportLists]–> ii. <!–[endif]–>Taxes

<!–[if
!supportLists]–>b. <!–[endif]–>Implications for
employers

<!–[if
!supportLists]–>c. <!–[endif]–>Implications for
spouses of workaholics

4.
Evidence.

1.
Line of evidence 1

<!–[if
!supportLists]–> i. <!–[endif]–>The evidence and what it means

<!–[if
!supportLists]–> ii. <!–[endif]–>Possible biases

<!–[if
!supportLists]–> iii. <!–[endif]–>Alternative explanations of what it means.

2.
Line of evidence 2

<!–[if
!supportLists]–> i. <!–[endif]–>The evidence and what it means

<!–[if
!supportLists]–> ii. <!–[endif]–>Possible biases

5.
Conclusion(s): All available evidence refutes the
hypothesis, but there are alternative explanations.

References:

Baker, A. &
Abel, E (2005) Villagers reject modern attitudes about car
washing. International Journal of Sociology, 11, 12-57.
Retrieved from EBSCO-Host.

Doe, J. (2010,
April 1) Villagers retain traditional attitudes despite bombardment
with western television. The New York Times. Retrieved
fromwww.nytimes.com/village_update

Steiner, H. (2012,
January 4) Revolt against local ordinances in the village. Time
Magazine. pp. 14-15.