Can someone do this assignment for me? This is the assignment.
Details:
This topic focuses on a personal examination of your faith. You will reflect on your own faith and how that faith affects your actions personally and professionally.
In a 750-1,000-word essay describe your faith and the role your faith plays in your personal and professional life. In your essay include the following:
- What is faith and where does it come from?
- Discuss the relationship between faith and actions.
- What are actions in your life that you believe are/were affected by your faith?
- Parker Palmer talks about people teaching “who they are”. Who are you as an educator? Who are you as a person of faith?
Include the citations for 3-5 peer reviewed articles from the GCU library.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
This is the Rubric
Personal Reflection Essay
| 1 No Submission 0.00% |
2 No Evidence 69.00% |
3 Unacceptable Evidence 74.00% |
4 Acceptable Evidence 87.00% |
5 Target Evidence 100.00% |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100.0 %Scaling | |||||
| 50.0 % Content Questions | No Submission | One or more of the content questions are not addressed. | All of the content questions are addressed. No supporting detail is provided, and the paper lacks self-reflection. | All of the content questions are addressed. Adequate supporting detail is provided, though the self-reflection remains vague and generalized. | All of the content questions are addressed. Rich supporting detail and insightful self-reflection are provided. |
| 30.0 %Demonstration of Reflective Practice | No Submission | Reflective practice is not demonstrated. | Reflective practice is vaguely demonstrated. | Reflective practice is demonstrated with meaningful observations presented. | Reflective practice is thoroughly demonstrated with meaningful and insightful observations thoughtfully presented. |
| 10.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose | No Submission | Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. | Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. | Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. | Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. |
| 10.0 %Mechanics | No Submission | Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. | Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistent language and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is lacking. | Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech, as well as some practice and content-related language. | Submission is nearly/completely free of mechanical errors and has a clear, logical conceptual framework. Word choice reflects well-developed use of practice and content-related language. Sentence structures are varied and engaging |
